四级课程经典
零基础适用HOT
去试听
四级1对1
定制化
核心词 背词计划
0元
听力 蜕变必备
0元
阅读 冲刺200+
0元
写作 高分模板带练
0元
送历年真题
免费
模考 水平测试
热门
1V1速成方案VIP
Supreme Court Helps Define ‘One Person, One Vote’
A cherub holding an open book adorns a flagpole on the plaza of the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, April 4, 2016. The justices ruled in a case involving the constitutional principle of “one person, one vote” and unanimously upheld a Texas law that counts everyone, not just eligible voters, in deciding how to draw districts. (Associated Press)
“One person, one vote” is a guiding principle of American democracy. But its exact meaning continues to be debated.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided one dispute.
In April, the court ruled that states can count all residents to set up election districts and not just those allowed to vote.
The issue is important because it decides how many seats in Congress and legislatures are given states and local communities.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the decision. In her ruling, she provided a history lesson.
In 1776, when the U.S. declared independence from Great Britain, only people who owned property could vote. It was not until 1920 that women won the right to vote.
Slaves were not permitted to vote. It took the Voting Rights Act of 1964 to end rules that stopped African-Americans from voting in some southern states.
In 2016, children under 18 still cannot vote. Nor can prisoners.
But in her ruling, Ginsburg wrote the nation’s founders believed everyone --- whether they voted or not – should be represented by their government. She said all people need government services.
“Representatives serve all residents, not just those eligible to vote,” Ginsburg wrote.
Michael Li works on voting rights issues for the Brennan Center for Democracy in New York. He said the Supreme Court ruling is important.
“We fought a revolution over taxation without representation and early on in our history we decided that people should be represented the same way, whether they vote or can’t vote,” Li said.
He said the Supreme Court ruling will help undocumented immigrants because they will continue to get counted, even if they cannot vote.
Two Supreme Court Justices – Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito -- also voted with Ginsburg in the 8-0 ruling. But they said the ruling should have limited effects.
Thomas and Alito said the ruling means the states can draw election districts based on all residents -- not just voters. The ruling does not mean the states must do this.
“The Constitution leaves the choice to the people alone – not to this court,” Thomas wrote.
Currently, all 50 states use U.S. Census Bureau data to determine representation. That includes all those counted – both voters and non-voters.
History of “one person, one vote”
American history is full of fights about how to define “one person, one vote.”
In 1787, there was a dispute between the northern states, where slavery was illegal, and southern states, where slavery was permitted.
In the North, people argued states that deny African-Americans the right to vote – and all other freedoms – should not count them for representation in Congress.
As a compromise, a slave was counted as 3/5 of a person. With the end of slavery in 1865 after the Civil War, the rule ended.
In 1964, the Supreme Court ruled that states must create legislative districts based on equal representation. At the time, some big cities, such as Los Angeles, were given the same representation in state legislatures as small communities.
There are other voting issues that likely will make their way through the courts. One is whether requiring voters to show picture identification violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee.
Supporters say requiring identification reduces fraud. But opponents say fraud is not a problem. They say the requirement will make it hard for minorities and older people without identification to vote.
Therefore, these opponents say, requiring picture identification violates the principle of “one person, one vote.”
Words in This Story
principle – n. a moral rule or belief that helps you know what is right and wrong and that influences your actions
residents – n. people who live in a community
eligible – v. able to do or receive something
revolution - n. the usually violent attempt by many people to end the rule of one government and start a new one
lesson - n. something learned through experience; something that is taught
fraud - n. cheating; using dishonest methods to make something value from another person
英语四级必备资料下载
英语四级必备工具:测测你的词汇量能过四级吗
新东方英语四级好课免费听↓↓↓
课程名称 | 课程亮点 | 试听 |
【小班课】英语四六级零基础无忧计划 | 1V1答疑 | 免费试听 |
【零基础】四六级全科专项突破 | 单项全面进阶 | 免费试听 |
【阅读】四六级阅读高分技巧 | 双师精讲阅读 | 免费试听 |
【写作】四六级写作万能模板 | 双师精讲写作 | 免费试听 |
【听力】四六级听力高分技巧 | 双师精讲听力 | 免费试听 |
【寒假班】英语四六级全程班 | 考前冲分快准狠 | 免费试听 |
了解更多四六级课程 |
资料下载
新东方四级词汇乱序版电子资料
发布时间:2020-04-15关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
英语口语8000句电子书籍
发布时间:2020-04-15关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
新东方在线[四六级王牌团队]典藏笔记(...
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【典藏笔记】获取
英语四级过级备考资料:经验+计划+语法
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级经验】获取
英语四级阅读讲义+长难句+翻译
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【阅读礼包】获取
英语四级写作模板|范文|句型|讲义
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【写作指导】获取
新东方·大学英语四级听力特训附音频
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【听力礼包】获取
英语四级口语考试练习题目【word版】
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
俞敏洪词根词缀记忆法
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号回复【典藏笔记】获取
关注新东方四级服务号,
获取学习资料
推荐阅读
更多>>想必不少同学在为英语四级听力头疼,其实四级听力并不可怕,只要掌握了正确的练习方式。新东方在线给大家分享2023下半年英语四级考试复
想必不少同学在为英语四级听力头疼,其实四级听力并不可怕,只要掌握了正确的练习方式。新东方在线给大家分享2023下半年英语四级考试复
想必不少同学在为英语四级听力头疼,其实四级听力并不可怕,只要掌握了正确的练习方式。新东方在线给大家分享2023下半年英语四级考试复
想必不少同学在为英语四级听力头疼,其实四级听力并不可怕,只要掌握了正确的练习方式。新东方在线给大家分享2023下半年英语四级考试复
想必不少同学在为英语四级听力头疼,其实四级听力并不可怕,只要掌握了正确的练习方式。新东方在线给大家分享2023下半年英语四级考试复
专项提升公开课
更多>>110小时干货精讲,包邮3斤礼盒,无忧换课
价格 : ¥269元
限报人数:1000人
名师解析,新学期备考攻略
价格 : ¥0元
限报人数:1000人
大咖云集 名师授课
价格 : ¥149元
限报人数:1000人
告别听力‘小聋瞎’
价格 : ¥0元
限报人数:10000人
资料下载
更多>>关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【典藏笔记】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级经验】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【阅读礼包】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【写作指导】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【听力礼包】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
阅读排行榜
相关内容